[openstack-dev] [E] [TripleO] scripts to do post deployment analysis of an overcloud
Tomas Sedovic
tsedovic at redhat.com
Mon Aug 8 14:02:51 UTC 2016
On 08/08/2016 11:05 AM, Hugh Brock wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Joe Talerico <jtaleric at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Hugh Brock <hbrock at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Jul 26, 2016 8:08 PM, "Gordon, Kent" <Kent.Gordon at verizonwireless.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Gonéri Le Bouder [mailto:goneri at lebouder.net]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 12:24 PM
>>>>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>>>> Subject: [E] [openstack-dev] [TripleO] scripts to do post deployment
>>>>> analysis
>>>>> of an overcloud
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> For the Distributed-CI[0] project, we did two scripts[1] that we use to
>>>>> extract
>>>>
>>>> Links not included in message
>>>>
>>>>> information from an overcloud.
>>>>> We use this information to improve the readability of the deployment
>>>>> logs.
>>>>> I attached an example to show how we use the extracted stack
>>>>> information.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now my question, do you know some other tools that we can use to do this
>>>>> kind of anaylsis?
>>>>> --
>>>>> Gonéri Le Bouder
>>>>
<snip>
>
> Tomaš, this seems like it might be useful for the deploy validations,
> and also for improving the quality of error reporting -- would you
> mind taking a look?
Yeah we may end up using the heat stack dump tool for some validations
since it puts all the Heat data in one place.
However, this seems like a great thing to be included in the openstack
overcloud deploy command and/or the mistral workflow.
I.e. after each deployment, we could run list_nodes_status to verify
that the overcloud nodes are indeed running and accessible (before
tempest) and dump the o-c-c logs to a known directory.
>
> --Hugh
>
>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list