Open Stack

On 08/08/2016 13:47, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-08-08 11:28:35 +0000:
>> On 05/08/2016 19:15, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Hayes, Graham's message of 2016-08-05 17:04:35 +0000:
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> We look like we are getting close to merging the os-api-ref integration
>>>> with openstackdocstheme.
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, there is no "phased" approach available - the version
>>>> released with compatibility for openstackdocstheme will not work
>>>> with oslo.sphinx.
>>>
>>> In what way doesn't it work? Is one of the themes missing something?
>>>
>>> Doug
>>
>> Both themes are laid out differently. One uses bootstrap and the other
>> doesn't, one has a different view on what should be hidden, and where
>> TOCs belong.
>>
>> The end result was that for the oslosphinx integration we included extra
>> CSS / JS, but that code can cause conflicts with openstackdocstheme.
>
> Would putting that extra stuff into oslosphinx, as an optional part of
> the them, make the transition any easier?
>
> Doug

I don't think so - with the changes to the structure of the HTML things
will be broken anyway.

It is unfortunate, but I think we have a better chance of doing the cut
over now, before more projects start using the library.

If everyone agrees with the patch for the phased roll over, I can submit
the patches to all the required repos, and help them get merged.

Graham

>>
>> As one theme already uses bootstrap, the css (and the classes applied
>> to the HTML elements) has to be modified, and is incompatible with the
>> old theme, as it was only using the sideloaded bootstrap css in a
>> section of the page.
>>
>> The review for the integration is here:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/322430/
>>
>> - Graham
>>
>>>
>>>> So, we need a way to use oslosphinx until it is released, and the new
>>>> theme after it is released.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I suggest we put a temporary section of code in the `conf.py` of each
>>>> project using os-api-ref - I have a WIP preview for designate up for
>>>> review [0]
>>>>
>>>> Can I get some feedback, if people think this is a good way forward?
>>>>
>>>> The list of repos I have using os-api-ref is (from [1]:
>>>>
>>>> openstack/networking-sfc
>>>> openstack/ceilometer
>>>> openstack/glance
>>>> openstack/heat
>>>> openstack/ironic
>>>> openstack/keystone
>>>> openstack/manila
>>>> openstack/designate
>>>> openstack/neutron-lib
>>>> openstack/nova
>>>> openstack/sahara
>>>> openstack/searchlight
>>>> openstack/senlin
>>>> openstack/swift
>>>> openstack/zaqar
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Graham
>>>>
>>>> 0 - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351800/
>>>> 1 -
>>>> http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=os_api_ref&i=nope&files=api-ref%2Fsource%2Fconf.py&repos=
>>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>