Open Stack

On 07/31/2016 02:29 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Steven Dake (stdake)'s message of 2016-07-31 18:17:28 +0000:
>> Kevin,
>>
>> Just assessing your numbers, the team:diverse-affiliation tag covers what
>> is required to maintain that tag.  It covers more then core reviewers -
>> also covers commits and reviews.
>>
>> See:
>> https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/tags/team_div
>> erse-affiliation.rst
>>
>>
>> I can tell you from founding 3 projects with the team:diverse-affiliation
>> tag (Heat, Magnum, Kolla) team:deverse-affiliation is a very high bar to
>> meet.  I don't think its wise to have such strict requirements on single
>> vendor projects as those objectively defined in team:diverse-affiliation.
>>
>> But Doug's suggestion of timelines could make sense if the timelines gave
>> plenty of time to meet whatever requirements make sense and the
>> requirements led to some increase in diverse affiliation.
> 
> To be clear, I'm suggesting that projects with team:single-vendor be
> given enough time to lose that tag. That does not require them to grow
> diverse enough to get team:diverse-affiliation.

The idea of 3 cycles to loose the single-vendor tag sounds very
reasonable to me. This also is very much along the spirit of the tag in
that it should be one of the top priorities of the team to work on this.
I'd be in favor.

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net