[openstack-dev] [Security][Barbican][all] Bring your own key fishbowl sessions

Fox, Kevin M Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov
Fri Apr 22 21:03:55 UTC 2016


Can you please give a little more detail on what its about?

Does this have any overlap with the instance user session:
https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9485

Thanks,
Kevin

________________________________
From: Rob C [hyakuhei at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 1:44 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Security][Barbican][all] Bring your own key fishbowl sessions


So that's one vote for option A and one vote for another vote :)

On 22 Apr 2016 4:25 p.m., "Nathan Reller" <nathan.s.reller at gmail.com<mailto:nathan.s.reller at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thoughts?

Is anyone interested in the pull model or actually implementing it? I
say if the answer to that is no then only discuss the push model.

Note that I am having a talk on BYOK on Tuesday at 11:15. My talk will
go over provider key management, the push model, and the pull model.
There are some aspects of design in it that will likely interest
people. You might want to take the poll after session because I'm not
sure how many people know what the differences are.

-Nate

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160422/e145010b/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list