Open Stack

Please check whether translation of these is setup in project-config, 

Andreas 
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu,
       Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) 
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

This email was sent from my phone


Gesendet mit AquaMail für Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com


On April 18, 2016 22:49:26 Joshua Harlow <harlowja at fastmail.com> wrote:

> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Joshua Harlow<harlowja at fastmail.com>  wrote:
>>> Okie, the following reviews are up:
>>>
>>> https://review.openstack.org/307461 (oslo.concurrency)
>>> https://review.openstack.org/307463 (oslo.cache)
>>> https://review.openstack.org/307464 (oslo.privsep)
>>> https://review.openstack.org/307466 (oslo.middleware)
>>> https://review.openstack.org/307467 (oslo.log)
>>> https://review.openstack.org/307468 (oslo.db)
>>> https://review.openstack.org/307469 (oslo.versionedobjects)
>>> https://review.openstack.org/307470 (oslo.service)
>>> https://review.openstack.org/307471 (oslo.reports)
>>>
>>> Do note that the following have a dependency on babel but do not depend on
>>> oslo.il8n:
>>>
>>> tooz
>>> oslo.context
>>> oslo.serialization
>>> debtcollector
>>>
>>> Should we do anything about the above four?
>>
>> Josh,
>>
>> Babel is mainly for translations:
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Translations
>>
>> So we can remove them
>>
>> -- Dims
>
> Okie, sounds fine with me,
>
> I hope there isn't any translation(s) in those four that people want/are 
> using, because its to my understanding that it will no longer exist if I 
> remove that dependency ;)
>
>>
>>> -Josh
>>>
>>> Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>>> Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas (dims)'s message of 2016-04-18 14:27:48
>>>> -0400:
>>>>> Josh,
>>>>>
>>>>> So Andreas and i talked a bit, it seems like NONE of the oslo.* libs
>>>>> except oslo.i18n needs a direct dependency on Babel. So we should yank
>>>>> them all out and bump major versions
>>>>>
>>>>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/latest.log.html#t2016-04-18T11:58:10
>>>>
>>>> I don't think we need to raise major versions to drop a dependency. We
>>>> only need to do that for backwards-incompatible changes, and this
>>>> doesn't seem to be one.
>>>>
>>>> Doug
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Dims
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Joshua Harlow<harlowja at fastmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/17/2016 09:15 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Oslo folks, Andreas and others,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Over the weekend oslo.log 3.4.0 was released. This broke keystone CI
>>>>>>>> jobs [2], even though the 3.4.0 was not specified in upper-constraints
>>>>>>>> as keystone jobs were not honoring the upper-constraints.txt, so we
>>>>>>>> fixed it in [3].
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So the first big problem after [3] was that several tox targets do not
>>>>>>>> inject u-c and hence fail, so in [3] we also added install_commands
>>>>>>>> for testenv:releasenotes and testenv:cover, based on the pattern set
>>>>>>>> in Nova's tox.ini [4]. That was still not enough and we had to add an
>>>>>>>> entry in keystone's requirements.txt for Babel even though it was not
>>>>>>>> there before (and hence pulling in latest Babel from somewhere).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So Here are the questions:
>>>>>>>> 1) Is there anyone working to fix all tox CI jobs to honor upper
>>>>>>>> constraints?
>>>>>>>> 2) Why do we need Babel in oslo.log's requirements.txt?
>>>>>>>> 3) Can we remove Babel from all requirements.txt and
>>>>>>>> test-requirements.txt and leave them in just tox.ini when needed?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Note that there was nothing wrong either in oslo.log itself it
>>>>>>>> published a release with what was in global-requirements.txt, nor in
>>>>>>>> keystone, which has traditionally not run with constraints on. Just
>>>>>>>> the combination of situations with Babel going bad broke at least
>>>>>>>> keystone.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did anyone else see other jobs break? Please respond!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Dims
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ygyxpjpbhlbz3q5d
>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://logs.openstack.org/86/249486/32/check/gate-keystone-python34-db/29ace4f/console.html#_2016-04-17_04_31_51_138
>>>>>>>> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/306846/
>>>>>>>> [4] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/tox.ini
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think what happened is:
>>>>>>> 1) oslo.log indirectly requires Babel
>>>>>>> 2) requirements blacklists Babel 2.3.x
>>>>>>> 3) keystone has new requirements included and thus fails
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The problem here is that oslo.log requires olso.i18n which requires
>>>>>>> Babel. And if oslo.i18n would have had a release with the blacklisting
>>>>>>> of Babel 2.3.x, this wouldn't have happened. So, I propose to release
>>>>>>> oslo.i18n.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Babel 2.3.4 which fixes the known problems might be out soon as well -
>>>>>>> and if that does not introduce regressions, this will self-heal,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, so which option should we go with here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm ok with releasing olso.i18n or Babel 2.3.4 (when is this release
>>>>>> happening, soon? like soon soon?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev