[openstack-dev] [ironic][nova][horizon] Serial console support for ironic instances
tiendc at vn.fujitsu.com
tiendc at vn.fujitsu.com
Wed Apr 13 10:06:47 UTC 2016
Hi
>From: Yuiko Takada [mailto:yuikotakada0313 at gmail.com]
>
>I've summarized all of related proposals.
>
Thanks for your summary, Yuiko Takada. It is great. I want to give you some more comments as below.
>(4)Add Ironic-ipmiproxy server
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296869/
>
>* Pros:
>- There is no influence to other components
>- Output log file
>- IPMIShellinaboxConsole will be also available via Horizon
>
>* Cons:
>- Need IPMIShellinaboxConsole changes?
>- Need to bump API microversion/RPC
* Pros:
- There is no influence to other components
- Output log file
- IPMIShellinaboxConsole will be also available via Horizon (backward compatibility)
- The proxy can serve across Ironic conductors (in case of multiple conductors)
* Cons:
- Need IPMIShellinaboxConsole changes (only add some code, no change the existing behaviors of it)
- Need to bump API microversion/RPC
For other specs, currently I don't have any comment due to the Yuiko Takada's summary is very detailed.
Best regards,
Dao Cong Tien
>
>
>From: Yuiko Takada [mailto:yuikotakada0313 at gmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 3:47 PM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova][horizon] Serial console support for ironic instances
>
>Hi,
>
>I also want to discuss about it at summit session.
>
>2016-04-13 0:41 GMT+09:00 Ruby Loo <rlooyahoo at gmail.com>:
>Yes, I think it would be good to have a summit session on that. However, before the session, it would really be helpful if the folks with proposals got together and/or reviewed each other's proposals, and summarized their findings.
>
>I've summarized all of related proposals.
>
>(1)Add driver using Socat
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/293827/
>
>* Pros:
>- There is no influence to other components
>- Don't need to change any other Ironic drivers(like IPMIShellinaboxConsole)
>- Don't need to bump API microversion/RPC
>
>* Cons:
>- Don't output log file
>
>(2)Add driver starting ironic-console-server
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/302291/
>(There is no spec, yet)
>
>* Pros:
>- There is no influence to other components
>- Output log file
>- Don't need to change any other Ironic drivers(like IPMIShellinaboxConsole)
>- No adding any Ironic services required, only add tools
>
>* Cons:
>- Need to bump API microversion/RPC
>
>(3)Add a custom HTTP proxy to Nova
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300582/
>
>* Pros:
>- Don't need any change to Ironic API
>
>* Cons:
>- Need Nova API changes(bump microversion)
>- Need Horizon changes
>- Don't output log file
>
>(4)Add Ironic-ipmiproxy server
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296869/
>
>* Pros:
>- There is no influence to other components
>- Output log file
>- IPMIShellinaboxConsole will be also available via Horizon
>
>* Cons:
>- Need IPMIShellinaboxConsole changes?
>- Need to bump API microversion/RPC
>
>If there is any mistake, please give me comment.
>
>
>Best Regards,
>Yuiko Takada
>
>2016-04-13 0:41 GMT+09:00 Ruby Loo <rlooyahoo at gmail.com>:
>Yes, I think it would be good to have a summit session on that. However, before the session, it would really be helpful if the folks with proposals got together and/or reviewed each other's proposals, and summarized their findings. You may find after reviewing the proposals, that eg only 2 are really different. Or they several have merit because they are addressing slightly different issues. That would make it easier to present/discuss/decide at the session.
>
>--ruby
>
>
>On 12 April 2016 at 09:17, Jim Rollenhagen <jim at jimrollenhagen.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:02:44AM +0800, Zhenguo Niu wrote:
>> Maybe we can continue the discussion here, as there's no enough time in the
>> irc meeting :)
>
>Someone mentioned this would make a good summit session, as there's a
>few competing proposals that are all good options. I do welcome
>discussion here until then, but I'm going to put it on the schedule. :)
>
>// jim
>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:06 AM, Zhenguo Niu <niu.zglinux at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Ironic is currently using shellinabox to provide a serial console, but
>> > it's not compatible
>> > with nova, so I would like to propose a new console type and a custom HTTP
>> > proxy [1]
>> > which validate token and connect to ironic console from nova.
>> >
>> > On Horizon side, we should add support for the new console type [2] as
>> > well, here are some screenshots from my local environment.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Additionally, shellinabox console ports management should be improved in
>> > ironic, instead of manually specified, we should introduce dynamically
>> > allocation/deallocation [3] mechanism.
>> >
>> > Functionality is being implemented in Nova, Horizon and Ironic:
>> > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/shellinabox-http-proxy
>> > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/ironic-shellinabox-console
>> > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:bug/1526371
>> >
>> >
>> > PS: to achieve this goal, we can also add a new console driver in ironic
>> > [4], but I think it doesn't conflict with this, as shellinabox is capable
>> > to integrate with nova, and we should support all console drivers.
>> >
>> >
>> > [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/shellinabox-http-proxy
>> > [2]
>> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/ironic-shellinabox-console
>> > [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1526371
>> > [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1553083
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Zhenguo Niu
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Zhenguo Niu
>
>
>
>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list