Open Stack

On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 05:54 -0400, John Trowbridge wrote:
> Hola OOOers,
> 
> It came up in the meeting last week that we could benefit from a CI
> subteam with its own meeting, since CI is taking up a lot of the main
> meeting time.
> 
> I like this idea, and think we should do something similar for the
> other
> informal subteams (tripleoclient, UI), and also add a new subteam for
> tripleo-quickstart (and maybe one for releases?).
> 
> We should make seperate ACL's for these subteams as well. The
> informal
> approach of adding cores who can +2 anything but are told to only +2
> what they know doesn't scale very well.

+1 for some subteams. I think they make good sense for projects which
are adopted upstream into projects like TripleO. I wouldn't say we have
to go crazy and do it for everything but for projects like quickstart
it seems fine to me.

Dan

> 
> - trown
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> _____
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs
> cribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev