Open Stack

On 4/12/16, 10:37 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:

>On 2016-04-01 15:50:57 +0000 (+0000), Hayes, Graham wrote:
>> If a team has already done a TA (e.g. as part of an internal
>> product TA) (and produced all the documentation) would this meet
>> the requirements?
>> 
>> I ask, as Designate looks like it meets nearly  all the current
>> requirements - the only outstanding question in my mind was the
>> Threat Analysis
>
>Seems fine to me, though in the interest of openness that
>documentation should probably be licensed such that it can be
>published somewhere for the whole community to read (once any
>glaring deficiencies are addressed anyway).
>-- 
>Jeremy Stanley

Perhaps the security team would take reviews to their documentation to add
the threat analysis documentation?

Regards,
-steve

>