Open Stack

As a note, there will be a design session around the API refactor
efforts going on.  Microversioning will be a topic.

On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 14:59 +0200, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Xianshan <xiexs at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi, Duncan & michael,
> > Thanks a lot for your replies.
> >
> > Definitely I agree with you that the microversion is the best approach to  
> > solve the backwards compat,
> > and the neutron is also going to adopt it [1]. But it will take a long  
> > time to totally introduce it into neutron I think.
> > So IMO, we can continue this discussion and then implement this feature  
> > in parallel with the microversion.
> >
> > Actually, according to the design [2], only a slight change will be done  
> > once the microversion landed, i.e.
> > replace the ' new header ' with the microversion to control the final  
> > format about the error message in the wsgi interface.
> >
> > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136760/
> > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298704
> 
> If no one is going to help with microversioning, it won’t ever happen. I  
> suggest we consolidate whichever resources we have to get it done, instead  
> of working on small API iterations as proposed in the thread.
> 
> Ihar
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev