[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

Vikram Choudhary vikschw at gmail.com
Fri Apr 8 05:11:16 UTC 2016


Thanks for resuming this up Armando!

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 29 March 2016 at 20:43, Vikram Choudhary <vikschw at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Armando,
>>
>> We want to add the support for a new ML2 driver. Can you please guide
>> what is the step moving forward?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Vikram
>>
>
> Vikram,
>
> Apologies for the late reply, the Mitaka release tasks took precedence and
> I did not have the time to fully resume this effort though it's my
> intention to come back to it in the next few days. To start with, I resumed
> [1,2] to reflect the team decision made in [3]. Now that Newton has
> started, and other repos of the same nature are available in openstack.org,
> it makes sense to give power back to the individual teams to be fully in
> charge of release and backport duties. Some of these projects were already
> released as indicated in [4], and I'll work with the openstack release team
> to clarify next steps for those that have not.
>
> Thanks,
> Armando
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/303026/
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/303039/
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276461/
> [4]
> https://github.com/openstack/releases/tree/master/deliverables/_independent
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Status update on this matter:
>>>
>>> Russell, Kyle and I had a number of patches out [1], to try and converge
>>> on how to better organize Neutron-related efforts. As a result, a number of
>>> patches merged and a number of patches are still pending. Because of Mitaka
>>> feature freeze, other initiatives too priority.
>>>
>>> That said, some people rightly wonder what's the latest outcome of the
>>> discussion. Bottom line: we are still figuring this out. For now the
>>> marching order is unchanged: as far as Mitaka is concerned, things stay as
>>> they were, and new submissions for inclusion are still frozen. I aim (with
>>> or without the help of the new PTL) to get to a final resolution by or
>>> shortly after the Mitaka release [2].
>>>
>>> Please be patient and stay focussed on delivering a great Mitaka
>>> experience!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Armando
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/branch:master+topic:stadium-implosion
>>> [2] http://releases.openstack.org/mitaka/schedule.html
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160408/1703b728/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list