Open Stack

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Ian Cordasco <sigmavirus24 at gmail.com> wrote:

> The goal is to centralize the server expertise and have that be combined
> with the folks who know how to better design a library for a good developer
> experience (kind of like with osc). That said, I think the SDK would have
> gained more traction if the OSC project had adopted it (which it is
> hesistant to do given the troubles it has had with conflicting versions of
> the service clients).
>

Actually it is simple timing.  I didn't want OSC to require the SDK until
they had a 1.0 release, but we went ahead and implemented Network commands
using the SDK anyway because there were no compatibility issues.  OSC
pre-dates the SDK by at least 2 years...

dt

-- 

Dean Troyer
dtroyer at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160405/30b39e3b/attachment.html>