Open Stack

+1 to demand meetings and asynchronous way

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Ildikó Váncsa <ildiko.vancsa at ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Hi Gordon,
>
> >
> > ie. the new PTL should checkpoint with subteam leads regularly to review
> spec status or identify missing resources on high-priority
> > items?
>
> I would say anything that we feel as useful information to people who read
> this mailing list. In this sense features that got implemented, items we
> are focusing on, as you mentioned resource bottlenecks on important items,
> etc.
>
> >
> > as some feedback, re: news flash mails, we need a way to promote roadmap
> backlog items better. i'm not sure anyone looks at Road
> > Map page...
> > maybe we need to organise it better with priority and incentive.
>
> I had the Roadmap page in mind as well partially, we could highlight the
> plans/tasks from that page and also track progress.
>
> Thanks,
> /Ildikó
>
> >
> > On 31/03/2016 7:14 AM, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > +1 on the on demand meeting schedule. Maybe we can also have some news
> flash mails  week to summarize the progress in our
> > sub-modules when we don't have the meeting. Just to keep people up to
> date.
> > >
> > > Will we already skip the today's meeting?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > /Ildikó
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Julien Danjou [mailto:julien at danjou.info]
> > >> Sent: March 31, 2016 11:04
> > >> To: liusheng
> > >> Cc: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Rescheduling IRC meetings
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 31 2016, liusheng wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Another personal suggestion:
> > >>>
> > >>> maybe we can have a weekly routine mail thread to present the things
> > >>> need to be discussed or need to be notified. The mail will also list
> > >>> the topics posted in meeting agenda and ask to Telemetry folks if  a
> > >>> online IRC meeting is necessary, if there are a very few topics or
> > >>> low priority topics, or the topics can be suitably discussed
> > >>> asynchronously, we can disuccs them in the mail thread.
> > >>>
> > >>> any thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> Yeah I think it's more or less the same idea that was proposed,
> > >> schedule a meeting only if needed. I'm going to amend the meeting
> wiki page with that!
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Julien Danjou
> > >> -- Free Software hacker
> > >> -- https://julien.danjou.info
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________________________________
> > > ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > Unsubscribe:
> > > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> >
> > --
> > gord
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160405/e0dc7a08/attachment.html>