Open Stack

Wanghua,

I do follow your logic, but docker-compose only needs the docker API to operate. We are intentionally avoiding re-inventing the wheel. Our goal is not to replace docker swarm (or other existing systems), but to compliment it/them. We want to offer users of Docker the richness of native APIs and supporting tools. This way they will not need to compromise features or wait longer for us to implement each new feature as it is added. Keep in mind that our pod, service, and replication controller resources pre-date this philosophy. If we started out with the current approach, those would not exist in Magnum.

Thanks,

Adrian

On Sep 28, 2015, at 8:32 PM, ?? <wanghua.humble at gmail.com<mailto:wanghua.humble at gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi folks,

Magnum now exposes service, pod, etc to users in kubernetes coe, but exposes container in swarm coe. As I know, swarm is only a scheduler of container, which is like nova in openstack. Docker compose is a orchestration program which is like heat in openstack. k8s is the combination of scheduler and orchestration. So I think it is better to expose the apis in compose to users which are at the same level as k8s.


Regards
Wanghua
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150929/b7389aa0/attachment.html>