Open Stack

Yeah we’re still using v1 as the clients that are packaged with most distros don’t support v2 easily.

Eg. with Ubuntu Trusty they have version 1.1.1, I just updated our “volume” endpoint to point to v2 (we have a volumev2 endpoint too) and the client breaks.

$ cinder list
ERROR: OpenStack Block Storage API version is set to 1 but you are accessing a 2 endpoint. Change its value through --os-volume-api-version or env[OS_VOLUME_API_VERSION].

Sam


> On 29 Sep 2015, at 8:34 am, Matt Fischer <matt at mattfischer.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, people are probably still using it. Last time I tried to use V2 it didn't work because the clients were broken, and then it went back on the bottom of my to do list. Is this mess fixed?
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-February/006366.html <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-February/006366.html>
> 
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne at e0ne.info <mailto:e0ne at e0ne.info>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> As you may know, we've got 2 APIs in Cinder: v1 and v2. Cinder v2 API was introduced in Grizzly and v1 API is deprecated since Juno.
> 
> After [1] is merged, Cinder API v1 is disabled in gates by default. We've got a filed bug [2] to remove Cinder v1 API at all.
> 
> 
> According to Deprecation Policy [3] looks like we are OK to remote it. But I would like to ask Cinder API users if any still use API v1.
> Should we remove it at all Mitaka release or just disable by default in the cinder.conf?
> 
> AFAIR, only Rally doesn't support API v2 now and I'm going to implement it asap.
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/194726 <https://review.openstack.org/194726> 
> [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1467589 <https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1467589>
> [3] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/073576.html <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/073576.html>
> Regards,
> Ivan Kolodyazhny
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-operators at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150929/dbb6897c/attachment.html>