Open Stack

Hi There,

I just added my comment on the review. I do agree with Emilien. There should be specific repos for plugins and drivers.

BTW. I love the sdnmagic name  ;-)

Edgar




On 9/25/15, 9:02 AM, "Emilien Macchi" <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:

>In our last meeting [1], we were discussing about whether managing or
>not external packaging repositories for Neutron plugin dependencies.
>
>Current situation:
>puppet-neutron is installing (packages like neutron-plugin-*) &
>configure Neutron plugins (configuration files like
>/etc/neutron/plugins/*.ini
>Some plugins (Cisco) are doing more: they install third party packages
>(not part of OpenStack), from external repos.
>
>The question is: should we continue that way and accept that kind of
>patch [2]?
>
>I vote for no: managing external packages & external repositories should
>be up to an external more.
>Example: my SDN tool is called "sdnmagic":
>1/ patch puppet-neutron to manage neutron-plugin-sdnmagic package and
>configure the .ini file(s) to make it work in Neutron
>2/ create puppet-sdnmagic that will take care of everything else:
>install sdnmagic, manage packaging (and specific dependencies),
>repositories, etc.
>I -1 puppet-neutron should handle it. We are not managing SDN soltution:
>we are enabling puppet-neutron to work with them.
>
>I would like to find a consensus here, that will be consistent across
>*all plugins* without exception.
>
>
>Thanks for your feedback,
>
>[1] http://goo.gl/zehmN2
>[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209997/
>-- 
>Emilien Macchi
>