[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2
Banashankar KV
banveerad at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 23:16:42 UTC 2015
But I think, V2 has introduced some new components and whole association of
the resources with each other is changed, we should be still able to do
what Kevin has mentioned ?
Thanks
Banashankar
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov> wrote:
> There needs to be a way to have both v1 and v2 supported in one engine....
>
> Say I have templates that use v1 already in existence (I do), and I want
> to be able to heat stack update on them one at a time to v2. This will
> replace the v1 lb with v2, migrating the floating ip from the v1 lb to the
> v2 one. This gives a smoothish upgrade path.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> ________________________________________
> From: Brandon Logan [brandon.logan at RACKSPACE.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 3:22 PM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat support for LbaasV2
>
> Well I'd hate to have the V2 postfix on it because V1 will be deprecated
> and removed, which means the V2 being there would be lame. Is there any
> kind of precedent set for for how to handle this?
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon
> On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 14:49 -0700, Banashankar KV wrote:
> > So are we thinking of making it as ?
> > OS::Neutron::LoadBalancerV2
> >
> > OS::Neutron::ListenerV2
> >
> > OS::Neutron::PoolV2
> >
> > OS::Neutron::PoolMemberV2
> >
> > OS::Neutron::HealthMonitorV2
> >
> >
> >
> > and add all those into the loadbalancer.py of heat engine ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Banashankar
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Sergey Kraynev
> > <skraynev at mirantis.com> wrote:
> > Brandon.
> >
> >
> > As I understand we v1 and v2 have differences also in list of
> > objects and also in relationships between them.
> > So I don't think that it will be easy to upgrade old resources
> > (unfortunately).
> > I'd agree with second Kevin's suggestion about implementation
> > new resources in this case.
> >
> >
> > I see, that a lot of guys, who wants to help with it :) And I
> > suppose, that me and Rabi Mishra may try to help with it,
> > because we was involvement in implementation of v1 resources
> > in Heat.
> > Follow the list of v1 lbaas resources in Heat:
> >
> >
> >
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::LoadBalancer
> >
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::Pool
> >
> >
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::PoolMember
> >
> >
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/template_guide/openstack.html#OS::Neutron::HealthMonitor
> >
> >
> >
> > Also, I suppose, that it may be discussed during summit
> > talks :)
> > Will add to etherpad with potential sessions.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sergey.
> >
> > On 22 September 2015 at 22:27, Brandon Logan
> > <brandon.logan at rackspace.com> wrote:
> > There is some overlap, but there was some incompatible
> > differences when
> > we started designing v2. I'm sure the same issues
> > will arise this time
> > around so new resources sounds like the path to go.
> > However, I do not
> > know much about Heat and the resources so I'm speaking
> > on a very
> > uneducated level here.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brandon
> > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:38 +0000, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> > > We're using the v1 resources...
> > >
> > > If the v2 ones are compatible and can seamlessly
> > upgrade, great
> > >
> > > Otherwise, make new ones please.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________________
> > > From: Banashankar KV [banveerad at gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:07 AM
> > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
> > usage questions)
> > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] - Heat
> > support for
> > > LbaasV2
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Brandon,
> > > Work in progress, but need some input on the way we
> > want them, like
> > > replace the existing lbaasv1 or we still need to
> > support them ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Banashankar
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Brandon Logan
> > > <brandon.logan at rackspace.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Banashankar,
> > > I think it'd be great if you got this going.
> > One of those
> > > things we
> > > want to have and people ask for but has
> > always gotten a lower
> > > priority
> > > due to the critical things needed.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Brandon
> > > On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 17:57 -0700,
> > Banashankar KV wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > I was thinking of starting the work on
> > heat to support
> > > LBaasV2, Is
> > > > there any concerns about that?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't know if it is the right time to
> > bring this up :D .
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Banashankar (bana_k)
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
> > for usage questions)
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> > >
> >
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
> > usage questions)
> > > Unsubscribe:
> > >
> >
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > >
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> > questions)
> > > Unsubscribe:
> >
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > >
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> > questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> >
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> > OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150922/e67d8869/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list