[openstack-dev] [openstack-operators][tc][tags] Rally tags

Roman Vasilets rvasilets at mirantis.com
Tue Sep 22 09:25:26 UTC 2015


As for me two ideal candidates for tags are "works-in-rally" and
"covered-by-rally". Other sound ugly. But this two are meaningful and
ingenious names.


On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Boris Pavlovic <boris at pavlovic.me> wrote:

> Thierry,
>
> Okay great I will propose patches.
>
> Best regards,
> Boris Pavlovic
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Boris Pavlovic wrote:
>> > I have few ideas about the rally tags:
>> >
>> > - covered-by-rally
>> >    It means that there are official (inside the rally repo) plugins for
>> > testing of particular project
>> >
>> > - has-rally-gates
>> >    It means that Rally is run against every patch proposed to the
>> project
>> >
>> > - certified-by-rally [wip]
>> >    As well we are starting working on certification
>> > task: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/225176/5
>> >    which will be the standard way to check whatever cloud is ready for
>> > production based on volume, performance & scale testing.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> The "next-tags" workgroup at the Technical Committee came up with a
>> number of families where I think your proposed tags could fit:
>>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-July/070651.html
>>
>> The "integration" family of tags defines cross-project support. We want
>> to have tags that say that a specific service has a horizon dashboard
>> plugin, or a devstack integration, or heat templates... So I would say
>> that the "covered-by-rally" tag could be part of that family
>> ('integration:rally' maybe ?). We haven't defined our first tag in that
>> family yet: sdague was working on the devstack ones[1] as a template for
>> the family but that effort stalled a bit:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203785/
>>
>> As far as the 'has-rally-gates' tag goes, that would be part of the 'QA'
>> family ("qa:has-rally-gates" for example).
>>
>> So I think those totally make sense as upstream-maintained tags and are
>> perfectly aligned with the families we already had in mind but haven't
>> had time to push yet. Feel free to propose those tags to the governance
>> repository. An example of such submission lives at:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/207467/
>>
>> The 'certified-by-rally' tag is a bit farther away I think (less
>> objective and needs your certification program to be set up first). You
>> should start with the other two.
>>
>> --
>> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150922/2db63a17/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list