Open Stack

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Anne Gentle <
> annegentle at justwriteclick.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:15 PM, John Griffith <john.griffith8 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33 -0700:
>>>>
>>>> > I think this is all superfluous however and we should simply encourage
>>>> > people to not wait until the last minute. Waiting to see who is
>>>> > running/what the field looks like isn't as important as standing up
>>>> and
>>>> > saying you're interested in running.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Doug
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> ​My dog ate my homework...
>>> My car wouldn't start...
>>> I couldn't figure out what UTC time was...
>>>
>>> The guidelines seemed pretty clear:
>>> Any member of an election electorate can propose their candidacy for the
>>> same election until September 17, 05:59 UTC​
>>>
>>> That being said, a big analysis on date/time selection etc doesn't
>>> really seem warranted here or harping on the fact that something 'went
>>> wrong'.  I as a TC member have no problem saying "things happen" and those
>>> that have submitted candidacy albeit late and are unopposed are in.. no
>>> muss no fuss.  I *think* we're all reasonable adults and don't know that
>>> anybody had in mind that the TC would arbitrarily assign somebody that
>>> wasn't even listed as a PTL for one of the mentioned projects.
>>>
>>>
>> It's not so simple for Magnum, with 2 late candidacies. We'll figure it
>> out but yes, we have work to do.
>>
>>
> It could be simple: Let magnum have an election with both candidates. As
> Monty said:
>
​+1

Also, not the second submitter stated they only submitted because they
noticed nobody else was running.  Regardless seems easy enough to deal
with. ​


>
> "... this is a great example of places where human judgement is better
> than rules."
>
> Thanks,
> Kyle
>
>
>> Anne
>>
>>
>> Moving on,
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anne Gentle
>> Rackspace
>> Principal Engineer
>> www.justwriteclick.com
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150917/2452ac4f/attachment.html>