Open Stack

Agreed, +1 :)

Gotta start somewhere to get to somewhere else ;)

mhorban wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
>  > Sounds like a useful idea if projects can plug-in themselves into the
>  > reloading process. I definitely think there needs to be a way for
>  > services to plug-in to this, although I'm not quite sure it will be
>  > sufficient at the current time though.
>  >
>  > An example of why:
>  >
>  > -
>  >
> https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/stable/kilo/cinder/volume/__init__.py#L24
>
>  > (unless this module is purged from python and reloaded it will likely
>  > not reload correctly).
>  >
>  > Likely these can all be easily fixed (I just don't know how many of
>  > those exist in the various projects); but I guess we have to start
>  > somewhere so getting the underlying code able to be reloaded is a first
>  > step of likely many.
>
> Each of openstack component should contain code responsible for
> reloading such objects.
> What objects will be reloaded? It depends of inspire and desire of
> developers/users.
> Writing such code is a second step.
>
> Marian
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev