Open Stack

On 9/17/2015 8:25 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
> PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on
> the wiki[0].
>
> There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this
> resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Barbican,
> MagnetoDB, Magnum, Murano and Security

This is devil's advocate, but why does a project technically need a PTL? 
  Just so that there can be a contact point for cross-project things, 
i.e. a lightning rod?  There are projects that do a lot of group 
leadership/delegation/etc, so it doesn't seem that a PTL is technically 
required in all cases.

>
> There are 7 projects that will have an election: Cinder, Glance, Ironic,
> Keystone, Mistral, Neutron and Oslo. The details for those will be
> posted tomorrow after Tony and I setup the CIVS system.
>
> Thank you,
> Tristan
>
>
> [0]:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_Elections_September_2015#Confirmed_Candidates
> [1]:
> http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141128-elections-process-for-leaderless-programs.html
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann