[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][devstack] New proposed 'default' network model
Armando M.
armamig at gmail.com
Tue Sep 15 19:20:09 UTC 2015
On 15 September 2015 at 11:28, Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 9/15/2015 10:27 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
>
>> Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote on 09/15/2015 11:04:07 AM:
>>
>> > a) an update to python-novaclient to allow a named network to be passed
>> > to satisfy the "you have more than one network" - the nics argument is
>> > still useful for more complex things
>>
>> I am not using the latest, but rather Juno. I find that in many places
>> the Neutron CLI insists on a UUID when a name could be used. Three
>> cheers for any campaign to fix that.
>>
>
> It's my understanding that network names in neutron, like security groups,
> are not unique, that's why you have to specify a UUID.
>
Last time I checked, that's true of any resource in Openstack.
>
>> And, yeah, creating VMs on a shared public network is good too.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> mike
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Riedemann
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150915/298e6bff/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list