Open Stack

Emilien,

I've discussed this with some of the Monasca puppet guys here who are doing
most of the work. I think it probably makes sense to move to that model
now, especially since the pace of development has slowed substantially. One
blocker before to having it "big tent" was the lack of test coverage, so as
long as we know that's a work in progress...  I'd also like to get Brad
Kiein's thoughts on this, but he's out of town this week. I'll ask him to
reply when he is back.


On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As a reminder, Puppet modules that are part of OpenStack are documented
> here [1].
>
> I can see puppet-murano & puppet-mistral Gerrit permissions different
> from other modules, because Mirantis helped to bootstrap the module a
> few months ago.
>
> I think [2] the modules should be consistent in governance and only
> Puppet OpenStack group should be able to merge patches for these modules.
>
> Same question for puppet-monasca: if Monasca team wants their module
> under the big tent, I think they'll have to change Gerrit permissions to
> only have Puppet OpenStack able to merge patches.
>
> [1]
> http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/puppet-openstack.html
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/223313
>
> Any feedback is welcome,
> --
> Emilien Macchi
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150914/24ec1265/attachment.html>