Open Stack

Malini,

Your note on the etherpad [1] went unnoticed as we had that sync on
Friday outside of our regular meeting and weekly meeting agenda etherpad
was not fit for discussion purposes.

It would be nice if you all can update & comment on the spec, ref. the
note or have someone send a relative email here that explains the
redressal of the issues raised on the spec and during Friday sync [2].

[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
[2]
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-glance/%23openstack-glance.2015-09-04.log.html#t2015-09-04T14:29:47

On 9/5/15 4:40 PM, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote:
> Thank you Nikhil and Glance team on the FFE consideration.
> We are committed to making the revisions per suggestion and separately seek help from the Flavio, Sabari, and Harsh.
> Regards
> Malini, Kent, and Jakub 
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 9:44 AM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal
>
> Hi Malini et.al.,
>
> We had a sync up earlier today on this topic and a few items were discussed including new comments on the spec and existing code proposal.
> You can find the logs of the conversation here [1].
>
> There are 3 main outcomes of the discussion:
> 1. We hope to get a commitment on the feature (spec and the code) that the comments would be addressed and code would be ready by Sept 18th; after which the RC1 is planned to be cut [2]. Our hope is that the spec is merged way before and implementation to the very least is ready if not merged. The comments on the spec and merge proposal are currently implementation details specific so we were positive on this front.
> 2. The decision to grant FFE will be on Tuesday Sept 8th after the spec has newer patch sets with major concerns addressed.
> 3. We cannot commit to granting a backport to this feature so, we ask the implementors to consider using the plug-ability and modularity of the taskflow library. You may consult developers who have already worked on adopting this library in Glance (Flavio, Sabari and Harsh). Deployers can then use those scripts and put them back in their Liberty deployments even if it's not in the standard tarball.
>
> Please let me know if you have more questions.
>
> [1]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-glance/%23openstack-glance.2015-09-04.log.html#t2015-09-04T14:29:47
> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Liberty_Release_Schedule
>
> On 9/3/15 1:13 PM, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote:
>> Thank you Nikhil and Brian!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nik.komawar at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 9:42 AM
>> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception 
>> proposal
>>
>> We agreed to hold off on granting it a FFE until tomorrow.
>>
>> There's a sync up meeting on this topic tomorrow, Friday Sept 4th at
>> 14:30 UTC ( #openstack-glance ). Please be there to voice your opinion and cast your vote.
>>
>> On 9/3/15 9:15 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>>> I added an agenda item for this for today's Glance meeting:
>>>    https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
>>>
>>> I'd prefer to hold my vote until after the meeting.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> brian
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/3/15, 6:14 AM, "Kuvaja, Erno" <kuvaja at hp.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Malini, all,
>>>>
>>>> My current opinion is -1 for FFE based on the concerns in the spec 
>>>> and implementation.
>>>>
>>>> I'm more than happy to realign my stand after we have updated spec 
>>>> and a) it's agreed to be the approach as of now and b) we can 
>>>> evaluate how much work the implementation needs to meet with the revisited spec.
>>>>
>>>> If we end up to the unfortunate situation that this functionality 
>>>> does not merge in time for Liberty, I'm confident that this is one 
>>>> of the first things in Mitaka. I really don't think there is too 
>>>> much to go, we just might run out of time.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your patience and endless effort to get this done.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Erno
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Bhandaru, Malini K [mailto:malini.k.bhandaru at intel.com]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 10:10 AM
>>>>> To: Flavio Percoco; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for 
>>>>> usage
>>>>> questions)
>>>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception 
>>>>> proposal
>>>>>
>>>>> Flavio, first thing in the morning Kent will upload a new BP that 
>>>>> addresses the comments. We would very much appreciate a +1 on the 
>>>>> FFE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Malini
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:flavio at redhat.com]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 1:52 AM
>>>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception 
>>>>> proposal
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/09/15 22:11 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wanted to propose 'Single disk image OVA import' [1] feature 
>>>>>> proposal for exception. This looks like a decently safe proposal 
>>>>>> that should be able to adjust in the extended time period of 
>>>>>> Liberty. It has been discussed at the Vancouver summit during a 
>>>>>> work session and the proposal has been trimmed down as per the 
>>>>>> suggestions then; has been overall accepted by those present 
>>>>>> during the discussions (barring a few changes needed on the spec itself).
>>>>>> It being a addition to already existing import task, doesn't 
>>>>>> involve API change or change to any of the core Image functionality as of now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please give your vote: +1 or -1 .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194868/
>>>>> I'd like to see support for OVF being, finally, implemented in Glance.
>>>>> Unfortunately, I think there are too many open questions in the 
>>>>> spec right now to make this FFE worthy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could those questions be answered to before the EOW?
>>>>>
>>>>> With those questions answered, we'll be able to provide a more, 
>>>>> realistic, vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I'd like us to evaluate how mature the implementation[0] is 
>>>>> and the likelihood of it addressing the concerns/comments in time.
>>>>>
>>>>> For now, it's a -1 from me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks all for working on this, this has been a long time requested 
>>>>> format to have in Glance.
>>>>> Flavio
>>>>>
>>>>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214810/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> @flaper87
>>>>> Flavio Percoco
>>>>> __________________________________________________________
>>>>> ________________
>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
>>>>> request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>> ____________________________________________________________________
>>>> _ _____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe: 
>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> _____________________________________________________________________
>>> _ ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: 
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-- 

Thanks,
Nikhil