Open Stack

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Matt Riedemann <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 9/4/2015 3:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>> There are a few things blowing up in the last 24 hours so might as well
>> make people aware.
>>
>> 1. gate-tempest-dsvm-large-ops was failing at a decent rate:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1491949
>>
>> Turns out devstack was changed to run multihost=true and that doesn't
>> work so well with the large-ops job that's creating hundreds of fake
>> instances on a single node.  We reverted the devstack change so things
>> should be good there now.
>>
>>
>> 2. gate-tempest-dsvm-cells was regressed because nova has an in-tree
>> blacklist regex of tests that don't work with cells and renaming some of
>> those in tempest broke the regex.
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1492255
>>
>> There is a patch in the gate but it's getting bounced on #3.  Long-term
>> we want to bring that blacklist regex down to 0 and instead use feature
>> toggles in Tempest for the cells job, we just aren't there yet.  Help
>> wanted...
>>
>>
>> 3. gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph is broken with glance-store 0.9.0:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1492432
>>
>> It looks like the gate-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph-src-glance_store job was
>> not actually testing trunk glance_store code because of a problem in the
>> upper-constraints.txt file in the requirements repo - pip was capping
>> glance_store at 0.8.0 in the src job so we actually haven't been testing
>> latest glance-store.  dhellmann posted a fix:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220648/
>>
>> But I'm assuming glance-store 0.9.0 is still busted. I've posted a
>> change which I think might be related:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220646/
>>
>> If ^ fixes the issue we'll need to blacklist 0.9.0 from
>> global-requirements.
>>
>> --
>>
>> As always, it's fun to hit this stuff right before the weekend,
>> especially a long US holiday weekend. :)
>>
>>
> I haven't seen the elastic-recheck bot comment on any changes in awhile
> either so I'm wondering if that's not running.
>

Looks like there was a suspicious 4 day gap in elastic-recheck, but it
appears to be running again?

$ ./lastcomment.py
Checking name: Elastic Recheck
[0] 2015-09-06 01:12:40 (0:35:54 old) https://review.openstack.org/220386
'Reject the cell name include '!', '.' and '@' for Nova API'
[1] 2015-09-02 00:54:54 (4 days, 0:53:40 old)
https://review.openstack.org/218781 'Remove the unnecassary
volume_api.get(context, volume_id)'


>
> Also, here is another new(ish) gate bug I'm just seeing tonight (bumped a
> fix for #3 above):
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystonemiddleware/+bug/1492508
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Riedemann
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150905/0f85e1af/attachment.html>