Open Stack

Henry,

I've applied the -2 (for Feature Freeze) to a bunch of patchsets, I think I
excluded your testing ones, but if the testing ones got -2'd please let me
know so I can remove the -2.

--Morgan

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Henry Nash <henryn at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:

> Great, thanks.
>
> Henry
> > On 4 Sep 2015, at 09:17, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
> >
> > Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> >>
> >>>    I would like to request an FFE for the remaining two patches that
> >>>    are already in review
> >>>    (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153897/ and
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154485/).
> >>>    These contain only test code and no functional changes, and
> >>>    increase our test coverage - as well as enable other items to be
> >>>    re-use the list_role_assignment backend method.
> >>>
> >>> Do we need a FFE for changes to tests?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I would say "no".
> >
> > Right. Extra tests (or extra docs for that matter) don't count as a
> > "feature" for the freeze. In particular it doesn't change the behavior
> > of the software or invalidate testing that may have been conducted.
> >
> > --
> > Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150904/fc436312/attachment.html>