Open Stack

Agreed.

Currently, pagination is broken on "Package definitions" page now, so
removing that filter
will fix it back. Also, 'Other' tab looks unhelpful, admin should indicate
to witch tenant this package belongs to.
This improvement will be added later.

Regards,
Kate.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Alexander Tivelkov <ativelkov at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> ​+1 on this.
>
> Filtering by ownership makes sense only on Catalog view (i.e. on the page
> of usable apps) ​but not on the admin-like console like the list of package
> definitions.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Alexander Tivelkov
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Dmitro Dovbii <ddovbii at mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> I want suggest you to delete owner filter (3 tabs) from Package
>> Definition page. Previously this filter was available for all users and we
>> agreed that it is useless. Now it is available only for admin but I think
>> this fact still doesn't improve the UX. Moreover, this filter prevents the
>> implementation of the search by name, because the work of the two filters
>> can be inconsistent.
>> So, please express your opinion on this issue. If you agree, I will
>> remove this filter ASAP.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dmytro Dovbii
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150904/4a269156/attachment.html>