Open Stack

I added an agenda item for this for today's Glance meeting:
   https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda

I'd prefer to hold my vote until after the meeting.

cheers,
brian


On 9/3/15, 6:14 AM, "Kuvaja, Erno" <kuvaja at hp.com> wrote:

>Malini, all,
>
>My current opinion is -1 for FFE based on the concerns in the spec and
>implementation.
>
>I'm more than happy to realign my stand after we have updated spec and a)
>it's agreed to be the approach as of now and b) we can evaluate how much
>work the implementation needs to meet with the revisited spec.
>
>If we end up to the unfortunate situation that this functionality does
>not merge in time for Liberty, I'm confident that this is one of the
>first things in Mitaka. I really don't think there is too much to go, we
>just might run out of time.
>
>Thanks for your patience and endless effort to get this done.
>
>Best,
>Erno
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bhandaru, Malini K [mailto:malini.k.bhandaru at intel.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 10:10 AM
>> To: Flavio Percoco; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>> questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal
>> 
>> Flavio, first thing in the morning Kent will upload a new BP that
>>addresses the
>> comments. We would very much appreciate a +1 on the FFE.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Malini
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:flavio at redhat.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 1:52 AM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Feature Freeze Exception proposal
>> 
>> On 02/09/15 22:11 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I wanted to propose 'Single disk image OVA import' [1] feature proposal
>> >for exception. This looks like a decently safe proposal that should be
>> >able to adjust in the extended time period of Liberty. It has been
>> >discussed at the Vancouver summit during a work session and the
>> >proposal has been trimmed down as per the suggestions then; has been
>> >overall accepted by those present during the discussions (barring a few
>> >changes needed on the spec itself). It being a addition to already
>> >existing import task, doesn't involve API change or change to any of
>> >the core Image functionality as of now.
>> >
>> >Please give your vote: +1 or -1 .
>> >
>> >[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/194868/
>> 
>> I'd like to see support for OVF being, finally, implemented in Glance.
>> Unfortunately, I think there are too many open questions in the spec
>>right
>> now to make this FFE worthy.
>> 
>> Could those questions be answered to before the EOW?
>> 
>> With those questions answered, we'll be able to provide a more,
>>realistic,
>> vote.
>> 
>> Also, I'd like us to evaluate how mature the implementation[0] is and
>>the
>> likelihood of it addressing the concerns/comments in time.
>> 
>> For now, it's a -1 from me.
>> 
>> Thanks all for working on this, this has been a long time requested
>>format to
>> have in Glance.
>> Flavio
>> 
>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214810/
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> @flaper87
>> Flavio Percoco
>> __________________________________________________________
>> ________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
>> request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev