[openstack-dev] [api][keystone][openstackclient] Standards for object name attributes and filtering
Dolph Mathews
dolph.mathews at gmail.com
Wed Sep 2 01:36:00 UTC 2015
Does anyone have an example of an API outside of OpenStack that would
return 400 in this situation (arbitrary query string parameters)? Based on
my past experience, I'd expect them to be ignored, but I can't think of a
reason why a 400 would be a bad idea (but I suspect there's some prior art
/ discussion out there).
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Ryan Brown <rybrown at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 11:28 PM, Chen, Wei D wrote:
> >
> > I agree that return 400 is good idea, thus client user would know what
> happened.
> >
>
> +1, I think a 400 is the sensible choice here. It'd be much more likely
> to help devs catch their errors .
>
> --
> Ryan Brown / Software Engineer, Openstack / Red Hat, Inc.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150901/c91c8f71/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list