[openstack-dev] [kolla] Liberty release builds

Sam Yaple samuel at yaple.net
Thu Oct 22 15:14:19 UTC 2015


No you should not push with latest tag.

The initial push should have tag '1.0.0-liberty-000'. After we validate
that is a good build we can add additional tags '1.0.0' and '1.0.0-liberty'

If the build is not good we will rebuild and repush with tag
'1.0.0-liberty-001'. We should never be overwriting a tag or pushing a
'latest' tag.
On Oct 22, 2015 10:00 AM, "Paul Bourke" <paul.bourke at oracle.com> wrote:

> Ok so now liberty is tagged we can nail down the process here. Suggest we
> push first with latest, then when happy add the following tags:
>
> * 1.0.0
> * 1.0.0-liberty
> * 1.0.0-liberty-release-001
>
> ===
> git clone https://github.com/openstack/kolla
> cd kolla
> git checkout tags/1.0.0-liberty
> tools/build.py \
>     --type source \
>     -- base < ... > \   # e.g. centos / ubuntu / oraclelinux / ...
>     --no-cache \
>     --push
> ===
>
> Please respond with whether you're happy or not with the above. Would be
> nice to get images pushed before the summit.
>
> Cheers,
> -Paul
>
> On 20/10/15 23:19, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/20/15, 9:06 AM, "Paul Bourke" <paul.bourke at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Kolla core team,
>>>
>>> Here's a link to an etherpad created just now for deciding the process
>>> on getting release builds to dockerhub:
>>>
>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-release-builds
>>>
>>> Please review and revise. Steve, can you follow up to this mail when
>>> you'd like volunteers to kick off builds?
>>>
>>
>> Paul,
>>
>> Thanks for the initiative here!  We actually had one last minute patch
>> that needs to go into the tree related to Ceph failing to build
>> occasionally because of timers, so I decided to not push the tag until it
>> was resolved.  This was compounded by a node pool restart which broke
>> about 4 hours of CI testing of the patch that needs to go in to fix the
>> problem.
>>
>> Once the release is tagged, we can go ahead and build for direct
>> consumption from the docker hub.
>>
>> Regards,
>> -steve
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> -Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151022/b777d822/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list