Open Stack

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 21 October 2015 at 09:53, Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21 October 2015 at 04:12, Gal Sagie <gal.sagie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do we also want to consider Project Kuryr part of this?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, why would we?
>>>
>>>
>> The reason to consider it is because Kuryr is a sub-project of Neutron,
>> and they are doing their spec submissions following the Neutron guidelines.
>> Adding the kuryr-core gerrit group to be on part with the *aas repos makes
>> sense here. If other sub-projects (like L2FW, SFC, etc.) start doing spec
>> reviews in the neutron-specs repository, then adding them makes sense too.
>>
>
> I don't believe this is the road we set ourselves on when we started the
> decomp/stadium. We wanted a clear separation of concerns and I don't see
> how going down this path is going to help us achieve that.
>
> I don't see the grounds to have such an abrupt change in direction right
> now, especially for the level of work that that would imply and the
> pressure that would put on the drivers team. Anyone is free to review and
> contribute where it matters for them, and location should not prevent them
> from doing so.
>
>
I was merely implying that since these projects are part of neutron, and
they have specs, keeping them in one place makes sense. And by doing that,
we'd need to give them +2 powers for their core reviewers. But, I'm fine
with leaving things the way they are and having them put their specs in
their devref. But we should update the devref in Neutron to reflect this,
e.g. that we don't expect specs in neutron-specs for things outside
[neutron, neutron-fwaas, neutron-lbaas, neutron-vpnaas].


>
>>
>>> We already started sending Kuryr spec to the Neutron repository and I
>>>> think it would make sense to manage it
>>>> as part of Neutron spec process.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, unless what you are asking are changes to the core. Do you have a
>>> reference for me to look at?
>>>
>>>
>> See above, perhaps I answered this for you.
>>
>
>>
>>>
>>>> Any opinions on that?
>>>>
>>>> Gal.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> During revision of the Neutron teams [1], we made clear that the
>>>>> neutron-specs repo is to be targeted by specs for all the Neutron projects
>>>>> (core + *-aas).
>>>>>
>>>>> For this reason I made sure that the neutron-specs-core team +2 right
>>>>> was extended to all the core teams.
>>>>>
>>>>> Be mindful, use your +2 rights with care: if you are core on a *-aas
>>>>> project, you should exercise that vote only for specs that pertain the
>>>>> project you're core of.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I could use this email as a reminder also of the core hierarchy and
>>>>> lieutenant system we switched to in Liberty ([3]): if you have been made
>>>>> core by a lieutenant of a sub-system, please use your +2/+A only within
>>>>> your area of comfort and reach out for help if in doubt.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviews are always welcome though!
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Armando
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/237180/
>>>>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/314,members
>>>>> [3]
>>>>> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/neutron-teams.html#core-review-hierarchy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards ,
>>>>
>>>> The G.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151021/673a603b/attachment.html>