Open Stack

+1 to Sebastian.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Sebastian Kalinowski
<skalinowski at mirantis.com> wrote:
> Roman, this was already discussed in [1].
> The conclusion was that we will implement new features in both places so
> user will not have to
> use "old" fuelclient to do some things and the "new" to others.
> There were no progress with moving old commands to new CLI and I didn't seen
> plans to do so.
> IMHO without a detailed plan on migrating old commands to new client and
> without a person (or people)
> that will drive this task we *cannot* freeze old fuelclient as new one is
> still not fully usable.
>
> Best,
> Sebastian
>
> [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-July/070279.html
>
>
> 2015-10-14 10:56 GMT+02:00 Roman Prykhodchenko <me at romcheg.me>:
>>
>> Fuelers,
>>
>> as you know a big effort has been put into making Fuel Client’s CLI better
>> and as a result we got a new fuel2 utility with a new set of commands and
>> options. Some folks still put great effort to move everything that’s left in
>> the old CLI to the new CLI.
>>
>> Every new thing added to the old CLI moves the point where we can finally
>> remove it to the future. My proposal is to do a hard code freeze for the old
>> CLI and only add new stuff to the new one.
>>
>>
>> - romcheg
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>