Open Stack

A follow-up...

On 13 October 2015 at 18:38, Armando M. <armamig at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi neutrinos,
>
> From last cycle, the team has introduced the concept of RFE bugs [0]. I
> have suggested a number of refinements over the past few days [1,2,3] to
> streamline/clarify the process a bit further, also in an attempt to deal
> with the focus and breadth of the project [4,5].
>
> Having said that, I would invite not to give anything for granted, and use
> the ML and/or join us on the #openstack-neutron-release irc channel to tell
> us what works and what doesn't about the processes we have in place.
>
> There's no improvement without feedback!
>

We have 400+ blueprints lingering [1], most of them are now rotten. In
order to try and improve the situation I also refined/proposed changes
about how we register/use blueprints [2]. Comments are welcome.

I will go through the pile, and the painstaking effort of cleaning up the
list.

Cheers,
Armando

[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+specs
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235640


>
> Cheers,
> Armando
>
> [0]
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/blueprints.html#neutron-request-for-feature-enhancements
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/231819/
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234491/
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234502/
> [4]
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/election/tree/candidates/mitaka/Neutron/Armando_Migliaccio.txt#n29
> [5]
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/election/tree/candidates/mitaka/Neutron/Armando_Migliaccio.txt#n38
> [6]
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/office-hours.html#neutron-ptl-office-hours
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151015/ac8335b5/attachment.html>