[openstack-dev] [magnum] Document adding --memory option to create containers
Ton Ngo
ton at us.ibm.com
Fri Oct 9 03:23:29 UTC 2015
We should reserve time at the next summit to discuss putting together a
detailed user guide, laying down a skeleton so contributors can start
filling in different parts.
Otherwise as we observe, everything is falling into the quick start guide.
Ton Ngo,
From: "Qiao,Liyong" <liyong.qiao at intel.com>
To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
Date: 10/08/2015 06:32 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Document adding --memory option to
create containers
+1, we can add more detail explanation information of --memory in magnum
CLI instead of quick start.
Eli.
On 2015年10月09日 07:45, Vikas Choudhary wrote:
In my opinion, there should be a more detailed document explaining
importance of commands and options.
Though --memory is an important attribute, but since objective of
quickstart is to get user a minimum working system within minimum
time, it seems better to skip this option in quickstart.
-Vikas
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Egor Guz <EGuz at walmartlabs.com>
wrote:
Adrian,
I agree with Steve, otherwise it’s hard to find balance what should
go to quick start guide (e.g. many operators worry about cpu or I/O
instead of memory).
Also I belve auto-scalling deserve it’s own detail document.
—
Egor
From: Adrian Otto <adrian.otto at rackspace.com<mailto:
adrian.otto at rackspace.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 13:04
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Document adding --memory
option to create containers
Steve,
I agree with the concept of a simple quickstart doc, but there also
needs to be a comprehensive user guide, which does not yet exist.
In the absence of the user guide, the quick start is the void where
this stuff is starting to land. We simply need to put together a
magnum reference document, and start moving content into that.
Adrian
On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) <stdake at cisco.com
<mailto:stdake at cisco.com>> wrote:
Quickstart guide should be dead dead dead dead simple.? The goal of
the quickstart guide isn’t to tach people best practices around
Magnum.? It is to get a developer operational to give them that
sense of feeling that Magnum can be worked on.? The goal of any
quickstart guide should be to encourage the thinking that a person
involving themselves with the project the quickstart guide
represents is a good use of the person’s limited time on the
planet.
Regards
-steve
From: Hongbin Lu <hongbin.lu at huawei.com<mailto:
hongbin.lu at huawei.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thursday, October 8, 2015 at 9:00 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Document adding --memory option
to create containers
Hi team,
I want to move the discussion in the review below to here, so that
we can get more feedback
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232175/
In summary, magnum currently added support for specifying the
memory size of containers. The specification of the memory size is
optional, and the COE won’t reserve any memory to the containers
with unspecified memory size. The debate is whether we should
document this optional parameter in the quickstart guide. Below is
the positions of both sides:
Pros:
·? ? ? ? ?It is a good practice to always specifying the memory
size, because containers with unspecified memory size won’t have
QoS guarantee.
·? ? ? ? ?The in-development autoscaling feature [1] will query the
memory size of each container to estimate the residual capacity and
triggers scaling accordingly. Containers with unspecified memory
size will be treated as taking 0 memory, which negatively affects
the scaling decision.
Cons:
·? ? ? ? ?The quickstart guide should be kept as simple as
possible, so it is not a good idea to have the optional parameter
in the guide.
Thoughts?
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/autoscale-bay
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
BR, Eli(Li Yong)Qiao[attachment "liyong_qiao.vcf" deleted by Ton
Ngo/Watson/IBM]
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151008/120a249e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151008/120a249e/attachment.gif>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list