[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Core Reviewers groups restructure

Dmitry Borodaenko dborodaenko at mirantis.com
Thu Oct 8 00:35:48 UTC 2015


On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:04:52PM -0700, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> While we're waiting for openstack-infra team to finish the stackforge
> migration and review our ACL changes, I implemented the rest of the
> changes agreed in this thread:
> 
> - Fuel-core group removed everywhere.
> 
> - Per-project core groups populated with individual reviewers as quoted
>   below. Exceptions:
> 
>   - Dennis Dmitriev was approved as core in fuel-qa, fuel-devops, and
>     fuel-ostf after this thread was started;

Correction: I meant fuel-qa and fuel-devops here, not fuel-ostf.

>   - fuel-upgrades already excludes fuel-core so I couldn't modify it,
>     and the current list doesn't match Mike's email. It is up to current
>     cores [0] to bring it up to date.
> 
> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1004,members
> 
> fuel-specs and fuel-*-release groups will have to wait until ACL update
> is merged (i.e. after October 17).
> 
> -- 
> Dmitry Borodaenko
> 
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 03:59:47PM -0700, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> > This commit brings Fuel ACLs in sync with each other and in line with
> > the agreement on this thread:
> > https://review.openstack.org/230195
> > 
> > Please review carefully. Note that I intentionally didn't touch any of
> > the plugins ACLs, primarily to save time for us and the
> > openstack-infra team until after the stackforge->openstack namespace
> > migration.
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Mike Scherbakov
> > <mscherbakov at mirantis.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks guys.
> > > So for fuel-octane then there are no actions needed.
> > >
> > > For fuel-agent-core group [1], looks like we are already good (it doesn't
> > > have fuel-core group nested). But it would need to include fuel-infra group
> > > and remove Aleksandra Fedorova (she will be a part of fuel-infra group).
> > >
> > > python-fuel-client-core [2] is good as well (no nested fuel-core). However,
> > > there is another group python-fuelclient-release [3], which has to be
> > > eliminated, and main python-fuelclient-core would just have fuel-infra group
> > > included for maintenance purposes.
> > >
> > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/995,members
> > > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/551,members
> > > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/552,members
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:06 AM Oleg Gelbukh <ogelbukh at mirantis.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> FYI, we have a separate core group for stackforge/fuel-octane repository
> > >> [1].
> > >>
> > >> I'm supporting the move to modularization of Fuel with cleaner separation
> > >> of authority and better defined interfaces. Thus, I'm +1 to such a change as
> > >> a part of that move.
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1020,members
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Oleg Gelbukh
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Mike Scherbakov
> > >> <mscherbakov at mirantis.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>> as of my larger proposal on improvements to code review workflow [1], we
> > >>> need to have cores for repositories, not for the whole Fuel. It is the path
> > >>> we are taking for a while, and new core reviewers added to specific repos
> > >>> only. Now we need to complete this work.
> > >>>
> > >>> My proposal is:
> > >>>
> > >>> Get rid of one common fuel-core [2] group, members of which can merge
> > >>> code anywhere in Fuel. Some members of this group may cover a couple of
> > >>> repositories, but can't really be cores in all repos.
> > >>> Extend existing groups, such as fuel-library [3], with members from
> > >>> fuel-core who are keeping up with large number of reviews / merges. This
> > >>> data can be queried at Stackalytics.
> > >>> Establish a new group "fuel-infra", and ensure that it's included into
> > >>> any other core group. This is for maintenance purposes, it is expected to be
> > >>> used only in exceptional cases. Fuel Infra team will have to decide whom to
> > >>> include into this group.
> > >>> Ensure that fuel-plugin-* repos will not be affected by removal of
> > >>> fuel-core group.
> > >>>
> > >>> #2 needs specific details. Stackalytics can show active cores easily, we
> > >>> can look at people with *:
> > >>> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/fuel-web/180. This is for
> > >>> fuel-web, change the link for other repos accordingly. If people are added
> > >>> specifically to the particular group, leaving as is (some of them are no
> > >>> longer active. But let's clean them up separately from this group
> > >>> restructure process).
> > >>>
> > >>> fuel-library-core [3] group will have following members: Bogdan D.,
> > >>> Sergii G., Alex Schultz, Vladimir Kuklin, Alex Didenko.
> > >>> fuel-web-core [4]: Sebastian K., Igor Kalnitsky, Alexey Kasatkin, Vitaly
> > >>> Kramskikh, Julia Aranovich, Evgeny Li, Dima Shulyak
> > >>> fuel-astute-core [5]: Vladimir Sharshov, Evgeny Li
> > >>> fuel-dev-tools-core [6]: Przemek Kaminski, Sebastian K.
> > >>> fuel-devops-core [7]: Tatyana Leontovich, Andrey Sledzinsky, Nastya
> > >>> Urlapova
> > >>> fuel-docs-core [8]: Irina Povolotskaya, Denis Klepikov, Evgeny
> > >>> Konstantinov, Olga Gusarenko
> > >>> fuel-main-core [9]: Vladimir Kozhukalov, Roman Vyalov, Dmitry Pyzhov,
> > >>> Sergii Golovatyuk, Vladimir Kuklin, Igor Kalnitsky
> > >>> fuel-nailgun-agent-core [10]: Vladimir Sharshov, V.Kozhukalov
> > >>> fuel-ostf-core [11]: Tatyana Leontovich, Nastya Urlapova, Andrey
> > >>> Sledzinsky, Dmitry Shulyak
> > >>> fuel-plugins-core [12]: Igor Kalnitsky, Evgeny Li, Alexey Kasatkin
> > >>> fuel-qa-core [13]: Andrey Sledzinsky, Tatyana Leontovich, Nastya Urlapova
> > >>> fuel-stats-core [14]: Alex Kislitsky, Alexey Kasatkin, Vitaly Kramskikh
> > >>> fuel-tasklib-core [15]: Igor Kalnitsky, Dima Shulyak, Alexey Kasatkin
> > >>> (this project seems to be dead, let's consider to rip it off)
> > >>> fuel-specs-core: there is no such a group at the moment. I propose to
> > >>> create one with following members, based on stackalytics data [16]: Vitaly
> > >>> Kramskikh, Bogdan Dobrelia, Evgeny Li, Sergii Golovatyuk, Vladimir Kuklin,
> > >>> Igor Kalnitsky, Alexey Kasatkin, Roman Vyalov, Dmitry Borodaenko, Mike
> > >>> Scherbakov, Dmitry Pyzhov. We would need to reconsider who can merge after
> > >>> Fuel PTL/Component Leads elections
> > >>> fuel-octane-core: needs to be created. Members: Yury Taraday, Oleg
> > >>> Gelbukh, Ilya Kharin
> > >>> fuel-mirror-core: needs to be created. Sergey Kulanov, Vitaly Parakhin
> > >>> fuel-upgrade-core: needs to be created. Sebastian Kalinowski, Alex
> > >>> Schultz, Evgeny Li, Igor Kalnitsky
> > >>> fuel-provision: repo seems to be outdated, needs to be removed.
> > >>>
> > >>> I suggest to make changes in groups first, and then separately address
> > >>> specific issues like removing someone from cores (not doing enough reviews
> > >>> anymore or too many positive reviews, let's say > 95%).
> > >>>
> > >>> I hope I don't miss anyone / anything. Please check carefully.
> > >>> Comments / objections?
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-August/072406.html
> > >>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/209,members
> > >>> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/658,members
> > >>> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/664,members
> > >>> [5] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/655,members
> > >>> [6] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/646,members
> > >>> [7] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/656,members
> > >>> [8] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/657,members
> > >>> [9] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/659,members
> > >>> [10] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1000,members
> > >>> [11] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/660,members
> > >>> [12] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/661,members
> > >>> [13] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/662,members
> > >>> [14] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/663,members
> > >>> [15] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/624,members
> > >>> [16] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/fuel-specs/180
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Mike Scherbakov
> > >>> #mihgen
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> __________________________________________________________________________
> > >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > >>> Unsubscribe:
> > >>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >>>
> > >> __________________________________________________________________________
> > >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > >> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Scherbakov
> > > #mihgen
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________________________
> > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Dmitry Borodaenko



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list