On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:32:53AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > The following review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171098 attempts to > raise the minimum libvirt version to 1.0.3. > > In May that was considered a no go - > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2015-May/007012.html > > Can we reconsider that decision and up this to 1.2 for what we're > regularly testing with. It would also allow some cleaning out of a lot > of conditional pathing, which is getting pretty deep in ifdefs - > https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/251e09ab69e5dd1ba2c917175bb408c708843f6e/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L359-L424 I've actually just sent a thread suggesting we pick 1.1.1: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-October/076302.html It is possible we could decide to pick a 1.2.x release, if we're willing to drop further distros. Lets continue the discussion in that other thread I created. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|