[openstack-dev] [ironic] Announcing Third Party CI for Proliant iLO Drivers

Dmitry Tantsur dtantsur at redhat.com
Mon Nov 30 17:33:14 UTC 2015


On 11/30/2015 06:24 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 11/30/2015 12:17 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>> On 11/30/2015 05:34 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
>>> On 11/30/2015 11:25 AM, Gururaj Grandhi wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        This is to announce that  we have  setup  a  Third Party CI
>>>> environment
>>>> for Proliant iLO Drivers. The results will be posted  under "HP
>>>> Proliant CI
>>>> check" section in Non-voting mode.   We will be  running the basic
>>>> deploy
>>>> tests for  iscsi_ilo and agent_ilo drivers  for the check queue.  We
>>>> will
>>>> first  pursue to make the results consistent and over a period of
>>>> time we
>>>> will try to promote it to voting mode.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      For more information check the Wiki:
>>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ironic/Drivers/iLODrivers/third-party-ci
>>>> ,
>>>> for any issues please contact ilo_drivers at groups.ext.hpe.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gururaja Grandhi
>>>>
>>>> R&D Project Manager
>>>>
>>>> HPE Proliant  Ironic  Project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please do not post announcements to the mailing list about the existence
>>> of your third party ci system.
>>
>> Could you please explain why? As a developer I appreciated this post.
>>
>>>
>>> Ensure your third party ci system is listed here:
>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems (there are
>>> instructions on the bottom of the page) as well as fill out a template
>>> on your system so that folks can find your third party ci system the
>>> same as all other third party ci systems.
>>
>> Wiki is not an announcement FWIW.
>
> If Ironic wants to hear about announced drivers they have agreed to do
> so as part of their weekly irc meeting:
> 2015-11-30T17:19:55  <devananda> I think it is reasonable for each
> driver team, if they want to announce it in the meeting, to do so on the
> whiteboard section for their driver. we'll all see that in the weekly
> meeting
> 2015-11-30T17:20:08  <devananda> but it will avoid spamming the whole
> openstack list
>
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-meeting-3/%23openstack-meeting-3.2015-11-30.log

I was there and I already said that I'm not buying into "spamming the 
list" argument. There are much less important things that I see here 
right now, even though I do actively use filters to only see potentially 
relevant things. We've been actively (and not very successfully) 
encouraging people to use ML instead of IRC conversations (or even 
private messages and video chats), and this thread does not seem in line 
with it.

>
> Thank you,
> Anita.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Ensure you are familiar with the requirements for third party systems
>>> listed here:
>>> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html#requirements
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Anita.
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list