[openstack-dev] [oslo] Should we make qpid/proton optional dependencies? (please say yes)
Victor Stinner
vstinner at redhat.com
Mon Nov 23 09:33:56 UTC 2015
Hi,
Would it be possible to use the "extra dependencies" thing in setup.cfg?
Robert Collins started a similar change for Oslo DB for make DB drivers
optional:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184328/
Sadly, this change was not merged yet.
@Robert: any progress on this change?
It would allow to ask for "Oslo Messaging with Qpid support" in service
dependencies, without knowning the exact required Python packages for Qpid.
Victor
Le 19/11/2015 19:22, Matt Riedemann a écrit :
> I want to fix a thing in oslo.messaging but to my surprise I can't run
> pep8. This is because python-qpid-proton tries to install qpid-proton
> and it can't get that because the apache site where it's hosted is down.
> [1]
>
> The apache site for qpid has actually been down a lot lately, I
> coincidentally know that because of trying to access QPID security
> issues for backports to things like Grizzly - yay for me!
>
> Anyway, depending on a 3rd party repo like this to get packages just to
> run pep8/unit tests in oslo.messaging is the suck. Can we make this
> optional? Isn't the qpid stuff in tree deprecated anyway?
>
> [1] http://paste.openstack.org/show/479460/
>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list