[openstack-dev] [oslo] Should we make qpid/proton optional dependencies? (please say yes)

Davanum Srinivas davanum at gmail.com
Thu Nov 19 19:07:54 UTC 2015


yes :)



On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Matt Riedemann
<mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I want to fix a thing in oslo.messaging but to my surprise I can't run pep8.
> This is because python-qpid-proton tries to install qpid-proton and it can't
> get that because the apache site where it's hosted is down. [1]
>
> The apache site for qpid has actually been down a lot lately, I
> coincidentally know that because of trying to access QPID security issues
> for backports to things like Grizzly - yay for me!
>
> Anyway, depending on a 3rd party repo like this to get packages just to run
> pep8/unit tests in oslo.messaging is the suck.  Can we make this optional?
> Isn't the qpid stuff in tree deprecated anyway?
>
> [1] http://paste.openstack.org/show/479460/
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Riedemann
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list