On 17/11/15 13:38, Alan Pevec wrote: > 2015-11-12 21:37 GMT+01:00 Zane Bitter <zbitter at redhat.com>: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/heat+branch:stable/juno,n,z >> >> It would be nice to treat the remaining 'High' priority one as a blocker. >> The rest aren't a blocker for the release but it would be really nice to at >> least have time to get them all backported and merged before the stable >> branch gets deleted. > > There are still quite a few open reviews for Heat Juno, please tell us > which should be merged as freeze exceptions, because immediately after > freeze Juno goes EOL! > > * https://review.openstack.org/245368 Medium > https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1424600 > * https://review.openstack.org/245373 Medium > https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1424899 > * https://review.openstack.org/246113 Medium > https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1471135 > * https://review.openstack.org/244957 Medium > https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1418935 > * https://review.openstack.org/246192 High > https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1508096 > * https://review.openstack.org/246163 Undecided > https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1419693 This is not the last of them either. I don't want to hold up the release for everybody. We got the High-priority fixes from Kilo that had been languishing on the backlog in already. It's nice to get patches merged, but the more important thing is to get reviews up because distributors can always grab patches from reviews, but once the branch is deleted and there are no more Jenkins tests we lose the ability to collaborate in any meaningful way on backports, and everybody is on their own. That's what we're trying to focus on at the moment. cheers, Zane.