On Nov 13, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Everett Toews <everett.toews at RACKSPACE.COM> wrote: >> Specifically this patch, or the ones dependent on it? Because this specific patch doesn't actually say anything. > > Specifically this patch. Just looking to initially move forward in some small way on this. I can see this generating a lot of controversy! :) -- Ed Leafe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20151113/db9de225/attachment.pgp>