Open Stack

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Lennart Regebro <lregebro at redhat.com> wrote:
> These changes are fine to me.
>
> I'm not so sure about the idea that we can't "hijack" other projects
> namespaces. If only ironic is allowed to use the prefix "baremetal",
> then the prefix should not have been "baremetal" in the first place,
> it should have been "ironic". Which of course means it would just be a
> replacement for the ironic client, making these whole namespaces
> pointless.

Actually, the 'baremetal' namespace is exactly what it should be,
based on other OSC clients. For instance, Neutron uses 'network', Nova
uses 'server', etc. The idea is that the client should use the service
type, not the codename of the project that implements it.