Open Stack

Btw, if u *do not* want to do a spec (using [1]) or blueprint let me 
know and I'll probably make a spec so that we can ensure (and agree on) 
the semantics of this because the specifics of what 'cancel' or 'abort' 
means start to matter.

[1] https://github.com/openstack/oslo-specs/blob/master/specs/template.rst

-Josh

Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Feel free to add it, or open a blueprint, or make a spec to :)
>
> Any of the above are ok with me.
>
> I did start prototyping something @
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184663/ (external cancellation) but it
> might be going in the wrong direction (or a different direction); so
> feel free to comment on that review if so...
>
> -Josh
>
> Gorka Eguileor wrote:
>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:47:42AM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>> Hi Team,
>>>
>>> Here are the etherpads from the summit[1].
>>
>> I remember that in Taskflow's Fishbowl session we discussed not only
>> pause/yield option but abort/cancel for long running tasks as well, but
>> reviewing the Etherpad now I don't see it there.
>>
>> Should I just add it to "Ideas for Liberty" section or there's a
>> specific reason why it wasn't included?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gorka.
>>
>>> Some highlights are as follows:
>>> Oslo.messaging : Took status of the existing zmq driver, proposed a
>>> new driver in parallel to the existing zmq driver. Also looked at
>>> possibility of using Pika with RabbitMQ. Folks from pivotal promised
>>> to help with our scenarios as well.
>>> Oslo.rootwrap : Debated daemon vs a new privileged service. The Nova
>>> change to add rootwrap as daemon is on hold pending progress on the
>>> privsep proposal/activity.
>>> Oslo.versionedobjects : We had a nice presentation from Dan about what
>>> o.vo can do and a deepdive into what we could do in next release.
>>> Taskflow : Josh and team came up with several new features and how to
>>> improve usability
>>>
>>> We will also have several new libraries in Liberty (oslo.cache,
>>> oslo.service, oslo.reports, futurist, automaton etc). We talked about
>>> our release processes, functional testing, deprecation strategies and
>>> debated a but about how best to move to async models as well. Please
>>> see etherpads for detailed information.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> dims
>>>
>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Liberty/Etherpads#Oslo
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev