Open Stack

I just did an abandon run for specs that meet this criteria and
haven't been touched since March. Once again, this isn't a kiss of
death, just an attempt at review backlog hygiene.

Cheers,
Michael

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:26 AM, John Garbutt <john at johngarbutt.com> wrote:
> On Monday, May 4, 2015, Michael Still <mikal at stillhq.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just wanted to let people know that I am going through abandoning
>> old specs for Nova at the moment. The criteria I am using is:
>>
>>  - spec targets kilo
>>  - no review comments or other activity since January or February
>>
>> I think its worth reinforcing that an abandon isn't a -2... An upload
>> of a new version of the spec will re-open reviews on it. Here's the
>> message I've been using while abandoning:
>>
>> "Please update this spec for Liberty if you're still interested in
>> pursuing it."
>>
>
> Thanks, I already did the ones not touched this year. Makes sense to take
> that a bit further.
>
> We should probably automate this to get parity with code patches, or
> something similar at least?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>>
>> --
>> Rackspace Australia
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Rackspace Australia