Open Stack

On 05/08/2015 04:09 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Mathieu Gagné <mgagne at iweb.com
> <mailto:mgagne at iweb.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 2015-05-07 4:19 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>     >
>     > Proposals
>     > =========
>     >
>     > #1 Creating puppet-oslo
>     > ... and having oslo::messaging::rabbitmq, oslo::messaging::qpid, ...,
>     > oslo::logging, etc.http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/puppet-openstacklib/refs/
>     > This module will be used only to configure actual Oslo libraries when we
>     > deploy OpenStack. To me, this solution is really consistent with how
>     > OpenStack works today and is scalable as soon we contribute Oslo
>     > configuration changes in this module.
>     >
>     > #2 Using puppet-openstacklib
>     > ... and having openstacklib::oslo::messaging::(...)
>     > A good thing is our modules already use openstacklib.
>     > But openstacklib does not configure OpenStack now, it creates some
>     > common defines & classes that are consumed in other modules.
>     >
> 
>     I prefer #1 due to oslo configs being specific to OpenStack versions.
> 
>     The goal of openstacklib is to (hopefully) be OpenStack version agnostic
>     and be used only for code common across all *our* modules.
> 
>     That's why I suggest going with solution #1, unless someone comes with a
>     solution to support multiple OpenStack versions in openstacklib without
>     the use of stable branches.
> 
> puppet-openstacklib already has stable branches:
>  http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/puppet-openstacklib/refs/
> 
> I was not aware of any assumption that openstacklib would work for
> different versions of our modules. I think this would be a difficult
> goal to achieve. For example, the provider code in puppet-keystone is
> tightly coupled with the code in puppet-openstacklib. If making
> puppet-openstacklib version-agnostic is important (and I do think there
> would be value in it) then maybe we should consider ripping out the
> provider backend code from puppet-openstacklib and creating a
> puppet-openstackclient module.

Here is a first try for puppet-oslo:
https://github.com/enovance/puppet-oslo
And a patch in puppet-nova: https://review.openstack.org/182482

It's POC now, but any feedback is welcome...

> 
> Colleen
> 
> 
>     --
>     Mathieu
> 
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

-- 
Emilien Macchi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150512/bc911e12/attachment.pgp>