Open Stack

Thanks for this response Daniel!.

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 03:58:59PM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On 05/11/2015 03:51 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
>> >  I invite Nova and nova-docker team members to join us to discuss
>> > this topic, and give us your input.
>>
>> If the Magnum team is interested in helping to maintain it, why not just
>> keep it as a separate repo?  What's the real value in bringing it into
>> the Nova tree?
>
> Well if that's the question you have to really ask why any of the current
> drivers are in tree. I don't really think it makes sense to single out
> Docker for special treatment, requiring them to justify why they want to
> be in tree. IMHO if we want drivers to live out of tree we should push them
> all out, if we want drivers to live in tree then we should actively welcome
> in any driver that has a team of people willing to maintain it, not require
> justification for wanting to be in tree.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
> |: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
> |: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
> |: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims