>From API-WG guideline, exceed quota should be 403 https://github.com/openstack/api-wg/blob/master/guidelines/http.rst 2015-05-06 3:30 GMT+08:00 Chen CH Ji <jichenjc at cn.ibm.com>: > In doing patch [1], A suggestion is submitted that we should return 400 > (bad Request) instead of 403 (Forbidden) > I take a look at [2], seems 400 is not a good candidate because > *'**The request could not be understood by the server due to malformed > syntax. The client SHOULD NOT repeat the request without modifications. * > *'* > > may be a 409 (conflict) error if we really don't think 403 is a good one? > Thanks > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173985/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html > > Best Regards! > > Kevin (Chen) Ji 纪 晨 > > Engineer, zVM Development, CSTL > Notes: Chen CH Ji/China/IBM at IBMCN Internet: jichenjc at cn.ibm.com > Phone: +86-10-82454158 > Address: 3/F Ring Building, ZhongGuanCun Software Park, Haidian District, > Beijing 100193, PRC > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150506/6acbda06/attachment.html>