Open Stack

The blueprint for this work appears to be
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api
which shows it didn't make it into Nova in Kilo.

Looking at the reviews, I agree they didn't get enough attention, but
there isn't a lot that we can do about that right now. We can revisit
this in Liberty.

Michael

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Daniel Comnea <comnea.dani at gmail.com> wrote:
> I see this spec has been merged however can anyone point out if this will
> make it into final Kilo release?
>
> Thanks,
> Dani
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>>
>> Are we yet at the point  in the New Year to register requests for
>> exceptions ?
>>
>>
>>
>> There is strong interest from CERN and Yahoo! In this feature and there
>> are many +1s and no unaddressed -1s.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for consideration,
>>
>>
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>> > Joe wrote
>>
>> > ….
>>
>> >
>>
>> >Nova's spec deadline has passed, but I think this is a good candidate for
>> > an exception.  We will announce the process for asking for a formal spec
>> > exception shortly after new years.
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Tim Bell [mailto:Tim.Bell at cern.ch]
>> Sent: 23 December 2014 19:02
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy
>>
>>
>>
>> Joe,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks… there seems to be good agreement on the spec and the matching
>> implementation is well advanced with BARC so the risk is not too high.
>>
>>
>>
>> Launching HMT with quota in Nova in the same release cycle would also
>> provide a more complete end user experience.
>>
>>
>>
>> For CERN, this functionality is very interesting as it allows the central
>> cloud providers to delegate the allocation of quotas to the LHC experiments.
>> Thus, from a central perspective, we are able to allocate N thousand cores
>> to an experiment and delegate their resource co-ordinator to prioritise the
>> work within the experiment. Currently, we have many manual helpdesk tickets
>> with significant latency to adjust the quotas.
>>
>>
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gordon0 at gmail.com]
>> Sent: 23 December 2014 17:35
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 23, 2014 12:26 AM, "Tim Bell" <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > It would be great if we can get approval for the Hierachical Quota
>> > handling in Nova too (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129420/).
>>
>> Nova's spec deadline has passed, but I think this is a good candidate for
>> an exception.  We will announce the process for asking for a formal spec
>> exception shortly after new years.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Tim
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Morgan Fainberg [mailto:morgan.fainberg at gmail.com]
>> > Sent: 23 December 2014 01:22
>> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Raildo,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks for putting this post together. I really appreciate all the work
>> > you guys have done (and continue to do) to get the Hierarchical Mulittenancy
>> > code into Keystone. It’s great to have the base implementation merged into
>> > Keystone for the K1 milestone. I look forward to seeing the rest of the
>> > development land during the rest of this cycle and what the other OpenStack
>> > projects build around the HMT functionality.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Morgan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Dec 22, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Raildo Mascena <raildom at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hello folks, My team and I developed the Hierarchical Multitenancy
>> >> concept for Keystone in Kilo-1 but What is Hierarchical Multitenancy? What
>> >> have we implemented? What are the next steps for kilo?
>> >>
>> >> To answers these questions, I created a blog post
>> >> http://raildo.me/hierarchical-multitenancy-in-openstack/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Any question, I'm available.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> Raildo Mascena
>> >>
>> >> Software Engineer.
>> >>
>> >> Bachelor of Computer Science.
>> >>
>> >> Distributed Systems Laboratory
>> >> Federal University of Campina Grande
>> >> Campina Grande, PB - Brazil
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Rackspace Australia