[openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

Jay Bryant jsbryant at electronicjungle.net
Fri Mar 27 01:29:00 UTC 2015


This effort has taken quite some time and was going to require hard
decisions to be made at some point.   You have been more than patient in
this process and I commend you for that as well as all the communication.

Thank you for continuing to drive this!

On Mar 24, 2015 10:55 PM, "Monty Taylor" <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote:

> On 03/24/2015 06:05 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Excerpts from Mark McClain's message of 2015-03-24 10:25:31 -0400:
> >>>
> >>> Echoing both Thierry and John.  I support Mike’s decision to enforce
> the
> >> requirement. Maintaining drivers in the tree comes with
> responsibilities to
> >> the community and 3rd party CI is one of the them.  Mike enforcing this
> >> requirement was the right action even if a hard one to take.
> >>>
> >>> mark
> >>
> >> Indeed. The deadlines were communicated clearly, and frequently.
> >> Making phone calls to reach out to contributors for issues like
> >> this is exceptional.
> >>
> >> +1000. Enabling contributors is great, but CI systems are an important
> > part of that enablement. I appreciate what Mike has done to drive Cinder
> > towards a quality level for all contributors here. It's a hard stance to
> > take, but saying "No" can sometimes be the right decision.
> I'm just going to pile on.
> People keep asking us to focus on quality over landing features. It was
> the #1 request from EVERY operator at the recent Ops summit. This is one
> of that facets of doing that. It's hard, and it doesn't always feel good
> to all the parties involved - but it's important.
> Thank you, Mike, for sticking to your deadline. OpenStack will be better
> for it.
> "If it's not tested, it's broken"
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150326/2296d836/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list