Open Stack

Thanks for clarifying!

Ryan

On Mar 26, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Mike Perez <thingee at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 00:24 Fri 27 Mar     , Ryan Hsu wrote:
>> Rightfully so, but it doesn't hurt to offer suggestions that might improve
>> the community. It would just be nice to have exclusions reconsidered if there
>> are legitimate bugs behind them. You see them all the time in the tempest
>> tests ala "SKIPPED: Skipped until Bug: 1373513 is resolved" so  it's hard to
>> understand why we can't just apply the same principles to third-party CI.
> 
> Your usage of exclusions is fine for fixing bugs in my opinion. My meaning of
> exclusion was not allowing these additional tests to be discovered.
> 
> -- 
> Mike Perez
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev