Open Stack

On 3/25/15, 3:21 PM, "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net> wrote:

>On 03/25/2015 09:03 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
>> 
>> From: Jordan Pittier <jordan.pittier at scality.com
>> <mailto:jordan.pittier at scality.com>>
>> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
>> Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 1:47 PM
>> To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] CI report formatting (citrix /
>> hyperv / vmware )
>> 
>> Hi
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net
>> <mailto:sean at dague.net>> wrote:
>> 
>>     Currently Citrix, HyperV, and VMWare CI systems reporting on Nova
>>     patches have a different formatting than the standard that Jenkins
>>and
>>     other systems are using:
>> 
>>     * test-name-no-spaces
>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__link.to_result&d=AwIF
>>aQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYB
>>k8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=WR2WbwJKtngJUjJEo4yFahEnv7RtC3NDaDsZFuzSukw&s=2Jr
>>ZtoZF3o4ThkkR34bJH77FMeEorM65K2FQR9pKSuM&e=
>>     
>><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__link.to_result&d=AwM
>>FaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JY
>>Bk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=5S
>>S-txUrD3o8KS3QIaCL3XMBbeCYK5CjmzmuxDda7Oc&e=>
>>     : [SUCCESS|FAILURE] some
>>     comment about the test
>> 
>> I don't want to talk for Citrix, HyperV or VMWare but the "standard"
>> only work if you use Zuul in your CI. I am using a setup based on a
>> Jenkins plugin called gerrit-trigger and there's no way to format the
>> message the way it's expected...
>> 
>> 
>>     This means these systems don't show up in the CI rollup block -
>>     
>>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dl.dropbox.com_u_6514
>>884_screenshot-5F158.png&d=AwIFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNt
>>Xt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=WR2WbwJKtngJUjJEo4
>>yFahEnv7RtC3NDaDsZFuzSukw&s=47UEXfmar4lGrIce8bEgHwvws7Lw0DPGWdEzPSDDAXQ&e
>>= 
>>     
>><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dl.dropbox.com_u_651
>>4884_screenshot-5F158.png&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMN
>>tXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2
>>k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=nIjYwznh1_8aVBSz-XVEJrpNaMsDfqyekOQ2IhiHTo8&
>>e=>
>> 
>> 
>> Current the Vmware CI will vote +1 iff the patch has passed on the CI.
>> We can investigate adding this to the CI rollup block.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>     I'd really like that to change. The CI rollup block has been
>>extremely
>>     useful in getting the test results of a patch above the fold, and
>>the
>>     ability to dig into them clearly. I feel like if any CI system isn't
>>     reporting in standard format that's parsible by that, we should
>>probably
>>     turn it off.
>> 
>> 
>> I do not think that we should turn this off. They have value. It would
>> be nice if things were all of the same format, which I guess that this
>> is the intension of the mail. Lets all try and make an effort to work
>> towards this goal.
>
>Right, honestly, I don't want these turned off, I want them reporting in
>a more standard format. But I do think if they don't report in a
>standard format it will cause problems and add to them being ignored.

Vmware Nova CI has been updated. Please see
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167713/ as an example.

>
>	-Sean
>
>-- 
>Sean Dague
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dague.net&d=AwIFaQ&c=S
>qcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9
>N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=WR2WbwJKtngJUjJEo4yFahEnv7RtC3NDaDsZFuzSukw&s=xIhHqi-2NYa
>hyaoPL1ItksCYtWuk6fTgcobpaGGpjUQ&e=
>